In October 2023, the real estate industry was rocked by the landmark Sitzer-Burnett case—a lawsuit that set new precedents for how real estate transactions are conducted in the United States. The case, formally known as Sitzer-Burnett v. National Association of Realtors (NAR), aimed to change the nature of real estate practices, commission structures, and agent-buyer relationships.
These changes went into effect a month ago—read on to find out what’s different and why you should care.
Understanding the Sitzer-Burnett Case
The Sitzer-Burnett case revolved around allegations that NAR's practices discouraged commission negotiation and resulted in inflated commissions. The plaintiffs argued that NAR’s rules, particularly those regarding commission structures, unfairly burdened home sellers with paying high commissions and limited options. The lawsuit also claimed that the practice of “requiring” sellers to offer a commission to the buyer’s agent led to inflated costs for both buyers AND sellers.
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs almost a year ago, declaring that the NAR's rules were indeed restrictive and violated federal antitrust laws. The ruling brought significant changes to how commissions are handled and how real estate transactions are conducted.
Key Changes Enacted by the Ruling
Since August 17th, 2024, real estate establishments nationwide have been required to make some major changes:
- Mandatory Buyer Agency Agreements: While buyer agency agreements are not new, they had previously been optional in many areas. Since buyer agents are no longer expecting to receive commission from the seller, they legally must agree upon a rate with their clients before participating in any real estate activities (such as showing a client homes).
- Disclosure of Commission Rates: The ruling requires that commission rates be disclosed more transparently. Previously, many buyers were unaware of the commission their agent was getting (since the sellers typically paid for both agents’ commissions). With commissions uncoupled, buyer agents are now mandated to clearly disclose these rates upfront, ensuring that buyers are fully informed about the costs associated with their transaction.
- Elimination of ‘Coupled Commission’ Policies: The court also struck down the widespread practice of expecting sellers to offer a commission to the buyer’s agent. This change means that sellers no longer feel pressured to pay the buyer’s agent, prompting buyers and buyer agents to agree on their commission amount separately.
- Increased Competition: By removing the expectation for sellers to pay the buyer’s agent, the ruling aims to foster increased competition among real estate agents. This move is designed to allow buyers and sellers more negotiating power, ultimately benefiting consumers.
- Revamp of the MLS System: The Multiple Listing Service (MLS)—an industry platform that real estate agents use to list and find homes—is also undergoing significant changes. The ruling requires MLS systems to modify their practices to comply with new transparency and competition standards. This includes altering how commission info is displayed and removing fields that offer buyer agents compensation from sellers.
Impact on the Real Estate Industry
The ramifications of the Sitzer-Burnett case are already being felt across the real estate sector for professionals and consumers alike. Here’s a closer look at how these changes are impacting the industry:
- Shift in Commission Structures: With the elimination of seller-covered commissions for buyer agents, there has been a notable shift in how commissions are negotiated. Sellers are more aware of their options and can save on costs by only paying their agent’s commission. In turn, buyers will often find themselves responsible for paying their agent's fees, which can lead to changes in how they approach negotiations and agent selection.
- Increased Transparency: The requirement for clearer disclosure of commission rates has led to a greater emphasis on transparency within the industry. Buyers and sellers are now more informed about the financial aspects of their transactions, leading to more straightforward negotiations.
- Greater Competition Among Agents: As the industry adapts to the new rules, there has been a rise in competition among real estate agents. Agents are now incentivized to offer more competitive rates and enhanced services to attract clients. This increased competition is expected to benefit consumers through lower costs and improved service quality.
- MLS System Adjustments: MLS systems are in the process of overhauling their practices to align with the new regulations.
- Potential for Market Disruption: The ruling has the potential to disrupt traditional real estate practices and prompt further reforms. As the industry adapts to these changes, we may see additional adjustments in how real estate transactions are conducted, including new business models and innovative approaches to buying and selling homes.
Looking Ahead
The Sitzer-Burnett case represents a pivotal moment in the real estate industry, ushering in a new era of transparency, competition, and consumer empowerment. As the industry continues to adjust to the ruling, it is essential for both professionals and consumers to stay informed about the evolving landscape. For consumers, the increased transparency and competition could lead to more favorable terms and better experiences in their real estate transactions.
Houwzer has always been committed to saving our clients money, without sacrificing service. Based on our highly successful seller offering, we’ve introduced a full-service, 1% commission model for buyers.
Save thousands when you buy
